Mepolizumab Reduces Systemic Corticosteroid Exposure in Eosinophilic COPD - HCPLive
This story deserves to be shared
Send it to someone who'd care, or post it on your networks.

In pooled phase 3 data, mepolizumab lowered mean yearly systemic corticosteroid exposure by 178.97 mg in patients with a BEC of ≥150 cells/µL. Mepolizumab (Nucala) reduced total yearly systemic corticosteroid (SCS) exposure, particularly high-dose courses, in patients with COPD and type 2 inflammation receiving inhaled triple therapy, according to pooled phase 3 data presented at the American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) 2026 Annual Meeting in Phoenix.¹,²Although treatment guidelines recommend SCS for COPD exacerbations, these agents are associated with complications in this population, prompting interest in targeted therapies capable of limiting their use.¹ Mepolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-5 (IL-5), is approved for patients with COPD and an eosinophilic phenotype.
This article is an excerpt. To read the full content, visit the original source. HCPLive
Related articles
Women’s health landscape shifting, but systemic hurdles remain - Clinical Trials Arena

Lab-designed molecule reduces amyloid beta, the protein linked to Alzheimer's disease, in mice - Medical Xpress
A research team led by the Molecular and Cellular Neurobiotechnology group at the Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), in collaboration with Míriam Royo's laboratory at the Institute for Advanced Chemistry of Catalonia (IQAC-CSIC), the University of Barcelona (UB) and the Institute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona), has identified a synthetic peptide that reduces the production of amyloid beta (Aβ).

Patient-Owned Health Data Model Reduces Clinical Trial Recruitment Redundancy - The Clinical Trial Vanguard
The same patient, identified and re-consented for the third or fourth time across separate studies, is not an edge case. It is how clinical research is currently structured, and the inefficiency is measurable: every redundant records request, re-registration, and repeat consent conversation adds cost to the sponsor and time to a patient already managing a demanding diagnosis. The case building around patient-owned health data argues that the architecture itself is the problem, not the execution. The traditional model treats each protocol as a discrete relationship. A trial opens, participants are found, data flows inward, and the relationship ends. But sponsors rarely stop needing evidence from the same populations once a study closes. Observational work, real-world outcomes, label extensions, and post-market commitments all draw on the same patient groups, rebuilt from scratch each time. What the patient-owned model proposes instead is a single consented relationship that persists across those activities, turning what was an episodic research interaction into ongoing infrastructure.
0 comments
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!