Scientists Predicted Humanity Would End on November 13, 2026. Should We Be Worried? - SciTechDaily
This story deserves to be shared
Send it to someone who'd care, or post it on your networks.

In 1960, scientists published a mathematical model predicting that humanity would face a population catastrophe on November 13, 2026. Credit: ShutterstockFor decades, a doomsday equation predicted population growth better than most experts, until falling birth rates undermined its forecast of catastrophe in 2026. In 1960, Science, one of the world’s leading science journals, published an article with an unambiguous title: Doomsday: Friday, 13 November, A. D. 2026. It predicted that on this future date—just over a month from today—the human population would approach infinity and effectively annihilate itself. The outlandishness of the claim landed the article in widespread public attention. More surprisingly—because its underlying research and math seemed sound—it also received careful and sustained scientific attention. The authors—Heinz von Foerster, an Austrian-American professor and cybernetics expert, and two of his students, Patricia M. Mora and Lawrence W. Amiot—argued that human populations are exceptional and might grow beyond an exponential rate, at an ever-increasing one. “Our great-great-grandchildren will not starve,” they argued.
This article is an excerpt. To read the full content, visit the original source. SciTechDaily
Related articles

SpaceX Sent 6,300 Pounds to the Space Station. The Strangest Cargo Was Grown in a Lab - Inc.com
The spacecraft delivered materials and equipment for new research studies to the station.

Ancient mud reveals a surprising secret about Greenland’s ice - Earth.com
Mud from a fjord shows an Atlantic air pattern brought wetter, colder spells to southern Greenland, a clue to how its ice may fare. Greenland’s ice is shrinking as the planet warms. But in the island’s southwest, rainfall and snowfall have been influenced by the same North Atlantic air-pressure pattern for at least 5,000 years. When that pattern tipped one way, the region turned wetter and colder. The record comes from mud on the floor of a Greenland fjord, and it suggests snowfall, not only temperature, shaped how the area’s ice grew and shrank. It doesn’t yet show how glaciers there will respond to the warming ahead. Johan Faust, a researcher at MARUM, the Center for Marine Environmental Sciences at the University of Bremen in Germany, led the work with colleagues in Germany, Norway, Denmark and Canada. A seesaw in the airThe pattern is called the North Atlantic Oscillation. It’s the difference in air pressure between a low that sits near Iceland and a high near the Azores, and it’s strongest in winter. When that difference is large, the pattern is in its positive phase. Northwestern Europe and southwestern Greenland both get more rain and snow.

Simulations explore nuclear mitigation of asteroid threats - Phys.org
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory researcher Isaiah Santistevan led the development of three-dimensional simulations exploring how a nuclear device could deflect or disrupt an asteroid threatening Earth. Credit: Blaise Douros/LLNL Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) researchers are developing three-dimensional simulations to examine how a nuclear device could be used to deflect or potentially disrupt an asteroid threatening Earth.

A giant asteroid will skim Earth in 2029—and it’s not us who should worry - Futura, le média qui explore le monde
The Futura Team represents the pulse of Futura’s editorial department, bringing together a collective expertise dedicated to the dissemination of scientific knowledge. Rather than the work of a single author, every article published under this signature is the result of a rigorous collaborative process involving journalists, editors, and fact-checkers. Specializing in news analysis via desk research and international wire services, the team focuses on transforming raw information into accessible, verified content. This curation and synthesis process ensures constant monitoring of technological innovations and major scientific breakthroughs. By cross-referencing sources and conducting multiple rounds of peer review, the Futura Team guarantees scientific accuracy and pedagogical clarity. This collective signature serves as a hallmark of trust, providing reactive, cross-disciplinary information at the forefront of current events Normally, when an asteroid swings by Earth, the burning question is simple: “Are we at risk?” Should we prepare for a massive space rock to pancake our planet? Not this time.
0 comments
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!