‘Running out of steam’: Bradford takes aim at Chow over new pitch for 15,000 youth jobs - CTV News

GTA Elections 2026Updated: October 15, 2026 at 2:58p.m. EDTPublished: October 15, 2026 at 9:23a.m. EDTToronto mayoral candidates Olivia Chow and Brad Bradford traded verbal jabs on Thursday, making separate announcements about affordability and unemployment as the mayoral race enters its final stretch. With just 11 days until Torontonians head to the polls, both candidates are ramping up their campaign stops amid new polling that suggests the two are locked in a tight race to become the city’s next mayor. How to set CP24 as your preferred source on GoogleHow to set CTV News as your preferred source on GoogleThe latest exclusive Nanos poll, conducted between Oct. 8 and Oct. 10, found 51 per cent of decided voters would cast a ballot for Chow if an election were held today, compared to 47 per cent for Bradford. The two candidates are also preparing to face off in their final debate, Toronto Decides: The Municipal Debate, airing live on CP24 on Oct. 22 at 7 p.m.

Brad Bradford and Olivia Chow are the leading candidates in Toronto’s mayoralty race. With their electoral showdown less than two weeks away, the leading contenders to be mayor of Toronto offered acutely different visions of the city’s present and its future Wednesday. Incumbent Olivia Chow and councillor Brad Bradford each spent an hour fielding questions from Star journalists on some of the most pressing issues facing Torontonians in separate meetings with this newspaper’s editorial board.

The 20th annual Cape to Cabot road race is taking place tomorrow. The grueling 20 km trek sees participants running from one historic landmark to another: From Cape Spear to Cabot Tower on top of Signal Hill. The race starts at 8 a.m., and because of that there are a few related road closures in St. John’s. Between 7:45 and 11a.m. there will be numerous road closures along the route. A full list can be found online at VOCM dot com. Expect traffic impacts from 7:45 a.m. to 11 a.m. on routes including Blackhead Road, Southside Road, Water Street, Harbour Drive, Duckworth Street, Temperance Street and Signal Hill Road.

On Monday, Albertans vote on whether to stay in Canada or hold another binding referendum on quitting Canada. If the vote goes as polls suggest, a majority of Albertans will mark an X to stay in Confederation, and Premier Danielle Smith has said if that’s so, she expects everyone to accept it and move on. Leaders of the independence movement contest that. And political watchers are divided about whether separation — previously a fringe sentiment — will now be a prominent, permanent feature of Alberta’s political landscape, as in Quebec. Julian Castro-Rea, a political-science professor at the University of Alberta who studies the separation debates in Quebec and Alberta, believes as long as Alberta feels alienated from the Canadian capital — feeling that Ottawa benefits from Alberta’s resource economy without giving back — the movement will have fuel. “Even if the referendum is lost, the westernization will still be around, because it’s kind of a way which, traditionally, Albertans have related to the rest of Canada,” says Castro-Rea, who believes western alienation may remain indefinitely. Story continues below advertisement

It’s no secret the long-held Canadian consensus on immigration has fractured — pulled apart by a rapid increase in new arrivals post-pandemic and growing affordability challenges. Now, that fracture is starting to show up at the ballot box. The Parti Québécois won a minority mandate in Quebec on a platform that included promises of tighter immigration controls, which the party linked to protecting French culture and easing pressure on public services and housing. And when Albertans head to the polls Monday to vote on whether to hold a future referendum on separation from Canada, they’ll also be answering five separate questions on immigration being pushed by the government of Alberta Premier Danielle Smith. Those questions include:— Should the province should have more say over economic immigration?— Should provincially funded services should be restricted to citizens, permanent residents and those with “Alberta-approved” immigration status? Story continues below advertisement