BBlogFlow

Countering drones is ‘critical’ as warfare evolves, Canada’s military says - Global News

·Oct 8, 2026
Source: Global News
Read the original article

This story deserves to be shared

Send it to someone who'd care, or post it on your networks.

Facebook Twitter Email

Russia pounds Ukraine, killing at least 24 people

Russian missiles and drones pounded Kyiv and other Ukrainian regions, killing at least 24 civilians, including four children, and wounding around 60 – Oct 7, 2026

This article is an excerpt. To read the full content, visit the original source. Global News

Reactions

0 comments

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Facebook Twitter

Related articles

Countering COVID-19 vaccine myths in pregnancy - Contemporary OB/GYN

News|Videos|October 16, 2026 Experts address COVID-19 vaccine myths, safety evidence, and how to frame the benefits of vaccination in pregnancy. Welcome to this Contemporary OB/GYN Special Report series on maternal immunization heading into the 2026-27 respiratory season. Across 5 episodes, our host and experts examine what the latest guidance means in practice for obstetric and pediatric clinicians and for the patients they counsel. Related to this articleOctober 16th, 2026Experts look ahead to new maternal vaccines and how to counsel patients on receiving several in one pregnancy. Read moreOctober 14th, 2026Experts discuss how obstetric and pediatric clinicians can coordinate to protect newborns. Read moreOctober 14th, 2026Experts review ACOG's 2026-27 guidance and the RSV window extension for pregnant and postpartum patients. Read moreOctober 15th, 2026Experts discuss common patient concerns about vaccination in pregnancy and strategies to improve uptake. Read moreOctober 13th, 2026On September 9, 2026, certolizumab pegol received FDA Breakthrough Therapy Designation for APS pregnancy; Jane E. Salmon, MD, reviews the IMPACT trial results behind it.

Contemporary OB/GYN·

Alberta referendum expected to bring finality, but also more questions on separation - Global News

On Monday, Albertans vote on whether to stay in Canada or hold another binding referendum on quitting Canada. If the vote goes as polls suggest, a majority of Albertans will mark an X to stay in Confederation, and Premier Danielle Smith has said if that’s so, she expects everyone to accept it and move on. Leaders of the independence movement contest that. And political watchers are divided about whether separation — previously a fringe sentiment — will now be a prominent, permanent feature of Alberta’s political landscape, as in Quebec. Julian Castro-Rea, a political-science professor at the University of Alberta who studies the separation debates in Quebec and Alberta, believes as long as Alberta feels alienated from the Canadian capital — feeling that Ottawa benefits from Alberta’s resource economy without giving back — the movement will have fuel. “Even if the referendum is lost, the westernization will still be around, because it’s kind of a way which, traditionally, Albertans have related to the rest of Canada,” says Castro-Rea, who believes western alienation may remain indefinitely. Story continues below advertisement

Global News·

How Canada’s fractured immigration consensus is starting to show up at ballot boxes - Global News

It’s no secret the long-held Canadian consensus on immigration has fractured — pulled apart by a rapid increase in new arrivals post-pandemic and growing affordability challenges. Now, that fracture is starting to show up at the ballot box. The Parti Québécois won a minority mandate in Quebec on a platform that included promises of tighter immigration controls, which the party linked to protecting French culture and easing pressure on public services and housing. And when Albertans head to the polls Monday to vote on whether to hold a future referendum on separation from Canada, they’ll also be answering five separate questions on immigration being pushed by the government of Alberta Premier Danielle Smith. Those questions include:— Should the province should have more say over economic immigration?— Should provincially funded services should be restricted to citizens, permanent residents and those with “Alberta-approved” immigration status? Story continues below advertisement

Global News·