BBlogFlow

Canadian SMEs’ perspectives on the new U.S. 50% tariffs and Canadian retaliatory tariffs - Canadian Federation of Independent Business | CFIB

·Aug 12, 2026
Source: Canadian Federation of Independent Business | CFIB
Read the original article

This story deserves to be shared

Send it to someone who'd care, or post it on your networks.

Facebook Twitter Email

This article is an excerpt. To read the full content, visit the original source. Canadian Federation of Independent Business | CFIB

Reactions

0 comments

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Facebook Twitter

Related articles

From Potential to Prosperity: The urgent case for greater investment in Canada's SMEs - SenCanada.ca

On 20 November 2025, the Standing Senate Committee on Banking, Commerce and the Economy (the Committee) was authorized to examine and report on access to credit and capital markets for small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)0F as the basis for growth and improved productivity in the Canadian economy. The Committee held 15 meetings on this topic, featuring approximately 24 hours of testimony from over 35 witnesses that included SMEs and representatives from various facets of the Canadian credit and capital markets. The Committee is calling for numerous fundamental changes to the Canadian financial system that would address the structural issues currently leading to persistent financing gaps for SMEs, the underinvestment of domestic capital in productive Canadian businesses and the loss of Canadian talent, business and intellectual property ownership. Recent events have dramatically accelerated the need to address this structural choke point in our economy where massive pools of assets remain inaccessible to our most promising growth companies and industries.

SenCanada.ca·

Power outages ramp up as windstorm sweeps through Edmonton and area - CTV News

AtlanticNova ScotiaNew BrunswickPrince Edward Island Newfoundland and LabradorCalgaryLethbridgeKitchenerGuelphNorthern OntarioSudburyNorth BaySault Ste. MarieTimminsOttawaKingstonBrockvillePembrokeReginaYorktonSaskatoonPrince AlbertTorontoWatchWeatherPeelHamiltonDurhamYorkHaltonNiagaraQueen's ParkToronto City HallIn PicturesVancouverVancouver IslandCanadaLocal SpotlightRoyal FamilyPoliticsNanosPower PlayQuestion PeriodFederal Election 2025WorldMideast ConflictRussia-Ukraine WarWatchLatestCaptured on CameraPoliticsLifestyleConsumerHealthExplainedEntertainmentTechnologyDeception DecodedAutosEnvironmentBusinessInflationReal EstateAutos

CTV News·

Electrocution that left Nova Scotia man dead happened during copper wire theft: RCMP - CTV News

AtlanticNova ScotiaNew BrunswickPrince Edward Island Newfoundland and LabradorCalgaryLethbridgeKitchenerGuelphNorthern OntarioSudburyNorth BaySault Ste. MarieTimminsOttawaKingstonBrockvillePembrokeReginaYorktonSaskatoonPrince AlbertTorontoWatchWeatherPeelHamiltonDurhamYorkHaltonNiagaraQueen's ParkToronto City HallIn PicturesVancouverVancouver IslandCanadaLocal SpotlightRoyal FamilyPoliticsNanosPower PlayQuestion PeriodFederal Election 2025WorldMideast ConflictRussia-Ukraine WarWatchLatestCaptured on CameraPoliticsLifestyleConsumerHealthExplainedEntertainmentTechnologyDeception DecodedAutosEnvironmentBusinessInflationReal EstateAutos

CTV News·

Runners Take on Cape to Cabot Challenge Tomorrow - VOCM

The 20th annual Cape to Cabot road race is taking place tomorrow. The grueling 20 km trek sees participants running from one historic landmark to another: From Cape Spear to Cabot Tower on top of Signal Hill. The race starts at 8 a.m., and because of that there are a few related road closures in St. John’s. Between 7:45 and 11a.m. there will be numerous road closures along the route. A full list can be found online at VOCM dot com. Expect traffic impacts from 7:45 a.m. to 11 a.m. on routes including Blackhead Road, Southside Road, Water Street, Harbour Drive, Duckworth Street, Temperance Street and Signal Hill Road.

VOCM·

Alberta referendum expected to bring finality, but also more questions on separation - Global News

On Monday, Albertans vote on whether to stay in Canada or hold another binding referendum on quitting Canada. If the vote goes as polls suggest, a majority of Albertans will mark an X to stay in Confederation, and Premier Danielle Smith has said if that’s so, she expects everyone to accept it and move on. Leaders of the independence movement contest that. And political watchers are divided about whether separation — previously a fringe sentiment — will now be a prominent, permanent feature of Alberta’s political landscape, as in Quebec. Julian Castro-Rea, a political-science professor at the University of Alberta who studies the separation debates in Quebec and Alberta, believes as long as Alberta feels alienated from the Canadian capital — feeling that Ottawa benefits from Alberta’s resource economy without giving back — the movement will have fuel. “Even if the referendum is lost, the westernization will still be around, because it’s kind of a way which, traditionally, Albertans have related to the rest of Canada,” says Castro-Rea, who believes western alienation may remain indefinitely. Story continues below advertisement

Global News·

How Canada’s fractured immigration consensus is starting to show up at ballot boxes - Global News

It’s no secret the long-held Canadian consensus on immigration has fractured — pulled apart by a rapid increase in new arrivals post-pandemic and growing affordability challenges. Now, that fracture is starting to show up at the ballot box. The Parti Québécois won a minority mandate in Quebec on a platform that included promises of tighter immigration controls, which the party linked to protecting French culture and easing pressure on public services and housing. And when Albertans head to the polls Monday to vote on whether to hold a future referendum on separation from Canada, they’ll also be answering five separate questions on immigration being pushed by the government of Alberta Premier Danielle Smith. Those questions include:— Should the province should have more say over economic immigration?— Should provincially funded services should be restricted to citizens, permanent residents and those with “Alberta-approved” immigration status? Story continues below advertisement

Global News·